Thomas Holzer wrote:.
But should it not be independent of SST at all?
Thomas Holzer wrote:Because it can use the WinHttpClient instead the SST HTTP client. Or even better, it should exclusively use only the WinHttpClient for production environments, due to the limitations of the SST HTTP client. What do you think?
those of us who don't run production on windows would really appreciate not having our support dropped in favor of exclusive support for WinHttpClient.
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest